Subject: RE: msxml (was: RE: Includes through XSL) From: Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 20:45:24 -0400 (EST) |
At 5 Aug 1999 16:51 -0700, Shalperin wrote: > There are at least two Java implementations that are kept > up-to-date and plenty more written in a handful of other languages. > Aside from the msxml.dll, there are several C++ XML parsers written > by industry leaders, but, sadly these do not implement XSL(T) - yet > they have Java counterparts that do and no immediate plans to > implement XSL(T) in the C++ versions. It begs the question: why is > the C++ community being ignored when it comes to XSL(T)? Saxon and XT are by individuals, not corporations, and one of those authors has (as far as I know) no official link to XSL. The same is probably true for the implementations written in that handful of other languages. Perhaps the question is: why is the C++ community ignoring XSL(T)? Regards, Tony Graham ====================================================================== Tony Graham mailto:tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9632 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: msxml (was: RE: Includes throug, Shalperin | Thread | Re: msxml (was: RE: Includes throug, Chris Maden |
RE: msxml (was: RE: Includes throug, Shalperin | Date | ifdefined test for variable, Jon Smirl |
Month |