Subject: Re: FO DTD from XSL WD. From: "Paul Tchistopolskii" <paul@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 20:45:03 -0700 |
> But the rendered result will be the same, the only difference is error > handling. > Consider two different XSL formatters: > A. Inheritable Attributes can go anywhere > B. Inheritable Attributes can only go on elements whose allowable decendants > can use that attribute > These two formatters will produce the same formatting, the only difference > is that B will report errors that A will not. >> Unfortunately in this case we have a situation when constrains >> are not expressed *at all*, not only in the DTD. >True. But, as I see it, they are constraints that only affect error >reporting, not the actual formatting. I agree with all you are saying. Hovewer, I don't like when some system silently ignores my errors. It may be the issue of taste. Rgds.Paul. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Email: paul@xxxxxxx http://www.pault.com PerlApplicationServer | XMLTube | Perl/JavaConnector =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: FO DTD from XSL WD., James Tauber | Thread | Re: FO DTD from XSL WD., James Tauber |
Re: FO DTD from XSL WD., James Tauber | Date | Re: FO DTD from XSL WD., James Tauber |
Month |