Subject: XSL controversy From: Charlie Kaiman <ckaiman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 12:17:27 -0400 |
Hello, It appears to me that there is a long-running controversy when in comes to XSL (at least when it comes to the transformational aspect of XSL, any way). On the one hand, we have the pro-XSL'ers; and on the other, the anti-XSL'ers. The anti-XSL'ers seem to think that the DOM is a better approach towards transforming XML, and the pro-XSL'ers obviously believe that XSL is the answer. My question is: will XSL be able to do everything that the DOM approach will enable you to do, and vice-versa? In other words, is there really a controversy, or are the anti-XSL'ers simply unwilling to learn something new? Thanks, in advance, for any input! Charles Kaiman Consultant i3solutions, Inc. www.i3solutions.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: fo:bidi-override - is it necess, Frank Wegmann | Thread | RE: XSL controversy, Maxime Levesque |
fo:bidi-override - is it necessary?, Steve Schafer | Date | Re: lists as parameters, Jon Smirl |
Month |