Re: Bashing XSL ..

["Matthew MacKenzie" <matt@xxxxxxxxx>]

I would be more impressed by his CSS/DOM rant had he made more convincing
use of said technologies in his article ... :-)

What would any two good aproaches be without a holy war between them?  [ vi
vs. emacs, win vs. *nix/nux, perl vs. sed/awk, sh vs. csh ... ]
_________________
Matthew MacKenzie
www.goxml.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Geimer <rick.geimer@xxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: Bashing XSL ..


> Wouldn't it be nice to write an XSL stylesheet for this article to ease
> viewing in a browser :-).
>
> Rick Geimer
> National Semiconductor
> rick.geimer@xxxxxxx
>
> Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >   I don't recall seeing this link on the "Someone bashing XSL" thread,
it
> > may be of interest.
> >
> > http://www.xml.com/1999/05/xsl/xslconsidered.xml
> >
> > ___
> > Matthew MacKenzie
> > matt@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list