Subject: Re: Bashing XSL .. From: "Matthew MacKenzie" <matt@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 21:12:31 -0700 |
I would be more impressed by his CSS/DOM rant had he made more convincing use of said technologies in his article ... :-) What would any two good aproaches be without a holy war between them? [ vi vs. emacs, win vs. *nix/nux, perl vs. sed/awk, sh vs. csh ... ] _________________ Matthew MacKenzie www.goxml.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Geimer <rick.geimer@xxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 4:29 PM Subject: Re: Bashing XSL .. > Wouldn't it be nice to write an XSL stylesheet for this article to ease > viewing in a browser :-). > > Rick Geimer > National Semiconductor > rick.geimer@xxxxxxx > > Matthew MacKenzie wrote: > > > > Hello, > > I don't recall seeing this link on the "Someone bashing XSL" thread, it > > may be of interest. > > > > http://www.xml.com/1999/05/xsl/xslconsidered.xml > > > > ___ > > Matthew MacKenzie > > matt@xxxxxxxxx > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Bashing XSL .., Rick Geimer | Thread | Re: Bashing XSL .., Rick Geimer |
href and template, f.merle | Date | Re: Weird IE5 behaviour, Matthew MacKenzie |
Month |