Subject: Re: entity replacement in xt From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 12:59:56 +0100 (BST) |
> But if I want something else... > It seems & is hardcoded in xt. Is this correct? The input document actually is in error as the XML spec says (Section 4.6) that if amp is declared then it _must_ be declared with the same definition as its predefined XML definition. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
entity replacement in xt, Vidar B. Gundersen | Thread | Re: XT Question -- Output always eq, Teemu Ropponen |
Re: old XSL -> New XSL, Miloslav Nic | Date | how does it fit in with the web, Sam.Walker |
Month |