Re: entity replacement in xt

Subject: Re: entity replacement in xt
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 12:59:56 +0100 (BST)
> But if I want something else...
> It seems &amp; is hardcoded in xt. Is this correct?

The input document actually is in error as the XML spec says (Section
4.6) that if amp is declared then it _must_ be declared with the same
definition as its predefined XML definition.

David


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread