Subject: Re: What will be the future improvements of XSLT? From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:28:16 +0700 |
Kay Michael wrote: > The real problem here is that XSL is far too rich in concepts for people > accustomed to "HTML with CSS stylesheets and a little JavaScript". The complete XSLT language probably is, but you can do useful things with a tiny subset (eg xsl:for-each and xsl:value-of), which I think is well within the reach of somebody who can manage HTML with a little JavaScript. > Perhaps we will have to write some front-end tools to make it > viable. I certainly hope there will be some front-end tools. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: What will be the future improve, Kay Michael | Thread | Re: What will be the future improve, Sebastian Rahtz |
RE: How to use xslt to transform xm, Harbarth, Juliane | Date | RE: Can XSL transform XML to RTF?, Didier PH Martin |
Month |