Subject: Re: What will be the future improvements of XSLT? From: "Chuck White" <chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 09:22:09 -0700 |
Definately not weird. It's not really a question of how complex is XSL for HTML/Javascript coders. If I hire someone to develop a system using XSL, I would simply compare their abilities to people like yourself, whose knowledge of XSL is in the upper tier. I don't say that to flatter you, but to state how I need to evaluate my needs. So the complexity of XSL, and any comparisons to it vis a vis a programming language are completely irrelevant to me. As for whether or not I am personally puzzled by XSL, again, that is an irrelevant issue (although I agree it is much less puzzling than any programming language and its mastery is mostly a matter of getting enough time to master the whole pattern/expression thing). If I really need to get an XSL scheme going, I will hire someone who can do it (if I can't), just like I'd hire a Javascript developer to write my scripts, an ASP developer to manage my NT server scripts, and a network administrator to manage my network. In the meantime, I'll focus on content. Chuck White (not speaking for my company) Creative Director ADVANCE Recruitment Advertising, Inc. chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.advancerecruitment.com ---------- >From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> >To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: What will be the future improvements of XSLT? >Date: Wed, Sep 15, 1999, 6:39 AM > >I find XSL far far less puzzling than javascript. Am I really weird? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: What will be the future improve, Tim McCune | Thread | RE: What will be the future improve, Khun Yee Fung |
Re: Old vs. New and LotusXSL, Sunil Jain | Date | Re: What will be the future improve, Tangi Vass |
Month |