<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: FO : precedence

Subject: Re: FO : precedence
From: pandeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Schafer)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:04:09 GMT
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 07:59:12 -0700, you wrote:

>Before and after should have precedence over start and end, if precedence
>is either true on both adjacent areas or if false on both.

The wording in the current WD implies the opposite. In fact, it
implies that the Precedence properties of fo:region-start or
fo:region-end don't play a role at all.

>The explanation will be clarified.

Anytime soon? :)

-Steve


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: FO : precedence, Stephen Deach Thread FO : display-sequence and inline-se, Bovone Stefano
RE: FO: positioning, Bovone Stefano Date FO:Inheritance. Re: display-sequenc, Paul Tchistopolskii
Month