Subject: Re: HTML forms with XSLT slideshow question From: "Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 08:41:13 +0100 |
> > extract from http://www.w3.org/1999/08/WD-xslt-19990813#extension > > >>> This version of XSLT does not provide a mechanism for defining > > >>> implementations of extensions. > > The XSLT spec defines that syntax for calling your extension functions, it > just doesn't define the calling conventions you need to use when > implementing the functions. All of the above systems (except MS) support >the same syntax for calling extensions functions but your code for >implementing the function will vary between the systems. > This is the point. I want my stylesheets portable and don't have much time to write proprietary implementations. In other words I want my stylesheets to be "XSLT stylesheets", not "XT XSLT stylesheets" or "SAXON XSLT stylesheets". Combination XSLT / ( Java- | Perl- | Python- )Script is processor independent. And until next version of XSLT draft (hopefully) I will stay with it. All this said, extensions shipped with XT are great and I use them, of course, even though they changed from July to August version of the XT processor. Nikita Ogievetsky http://www.cogx.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: HTML forms with XSLT slideshow , Jon Smirl | Thread | Re: HTML forms with XSLT slideshow , Smith, Brian BC SSI |
Re: Merging two documents, Terris | Date | [no subject], sotiris |
Month |