Subject: PROPOSAL: default behavior if no source document From: Mike Brown <mbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 10:45:07 -0600 |
The emergence of the document() function in XSLT makes it possible for a stylesheet to reference all the source trees that it needs. Thus, a stylesheet may choose to ignore the "primary" source tree. XSL processors, however, are currently designed with the assumption that the stylesheet must be associated with a primary source tree. Would it be within the scope of either the XML-Stylesheet Recommendation, the XSL or XSLT recommendations to state that when no source tree or source XML document is associated with the stylesheet, the XSL processor [may, should or must] use a "empty" source tree? And would such a tree consist of only a root node? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: first-of-type, Kay Michael | Thread | Is fo:block an area-container?, Steve Schafer |
Re: select-distinct in for-each ?, David Carlisle | Date | Is fo:block an area-container?, Steve Schafer |
Month |