Subject: Re: select-distinct in for-each ? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 17:44:59 +0100 (BST) |
> That only solves a small subset of the problem. yes, I agree. > If you're looking for possible XSL extensions, start with the SAXON > group-by Yes, there is an interesting thread on that on this list a while ago. Actually the improvement I'd _really_ like to see in the area of sorting is getting the sorted tree back to run templates over again. I think you said you had an extension function to coerce result tree fragments back to node lists didn't you? David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: select-distinct in for-each ?, Kay Michael | Thread | RE: select-distinct in for-each ?, Mike Brown |
Re: normalize as part of a 'select-, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | PROPOSAL: default behavior if no so, Mike Brown |
Month |