Subject: RE: What does fo: stand for? From: David LeBlanc <whisper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 18:36:15 -0700 |
I believe the normally used term for "fo" is flow object. Dave LeBlanc At 08:15 PM 10/6/99 -0400, Didier PH Martin wrote: >Hi Chuck, > >You can pick whatever you want :-) However, formatting object is better than >flow object because a formatting object could be positioned with an absolute >position and therefore won't be a flow object. So, formatting object seems >better. > >Cheers >Didier PH Martin >mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.netfolder.com > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chuck White >Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 7:08 PM >To: xsl >Subject: What does fo: stand for? > > >I know this may seem a ridiculous question, but I'm trying to do some >documentation on FOs, and I don't see anything in the spec regarding whether >the fo: in the namespace prefix is supposed to refer to formatting object or >flow object. Is there a definitive answer to this somewhere in the spec that >someone knows of and I'm just missing it? > >thanks. >Chuck White >Creative Director >ADVANCE Recruitment Advertising, Inc. >chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.advancerecruitment.com > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: What does fo: stand for?, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: What does fo: stand for?, Stephen Deach |
RE: XML/XSL unixish transform?, Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: What does fo: stand for?, Stephen Deach |
Month |