Subject: Re: foo ... bar Re: Q: XML+XSL transforms to a print-ready format From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:25:39 -0400 |
>From Paul's last reply to me, I think Paul and I have now phrased things in such a way that we agree with each other. I suspect we really did all along. The open issue is the interaction between user requirements, the scope of the spec and what an implementation actually does. I think this is an issue that extends well beyond XSL to standards-based development generally. > The only question for me is now why should not I do it in the > proprietary way? Well, you don't have a choice. You *have* to do it a proprietary way because there is no standard way. Perhaps if you, Sebastian and I implement it the *same* way it won't be so bad. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: foo ... bar Re: Q: XML+XSL tran, James Robertson | Thread | XSL FO how to make things go. Re: , Paul Tchistopolskii |
Re: page numbers. Re: Q: XML+XSL tr, Paul Tchistopolskii | Date | Re: foo ... bar Re: Q: XML+XSL tran, James Tauber |
Month |