Re: XSL FOs after 1.0

Subject: Re: XSL FOs after 1.0
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 12:17:42 +0100 (BST)
James Tauber writes:
 > Sebastian expressed his preference for a feature-filled XSL later rather
 > than a feature-lacking one sooner.
 > 
 > I have no probably with a lighter 1.0 coming out sooner AS LONG AS FURTHER
 > VERSIONS WILL FOLLOW.

and as long as the feature mix is justified and explained.....

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread