Subject: RE: XSL and the DOM From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 09:47:18 +0100 |
> Right now all of the XSL processors are taking SAX events and > building their own DOM trees with their own APIs. Could this be split out > in standard manner if the DOM supported namespaces and XPath? There were two main reasons I moved away from using DOM as my native tree format in SAXON: firstly, the lack of extensibility (no standard way of adding my own data and methods to the nodes), and secondly, performance concerns. I say concerns because it's not so much that DOM implementations are slow, rather that they make no performance guarantees, so it's impossible to know which methods are going to be efficient and which aren't. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL and the DOM, Jon Smirl | Thread | Re: XSL and the DOM, Jon Smirl |
limitations of preceding-sibling an, Earl Bingham | Date | Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |