Re: Using xt with IIS and ASP

["Dave Carlson" <dcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A note was posted to this mail list a week or so ago, showing stats that
logusXSL and XT has similar performance for small documents, but that
lotusXSL very quickly exploded in processing time for large documents.  XT,
on the other hand, had relatively good linear scalability.  I assume this is
due to the fact that lotusXSL uses DOM for internal data structures, whereas
XT is based on a leaner design.  I'd be very interested in others'
experience with DOM vs non-DOM implementations of XSL processors.

  -- Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: Lung <lung@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 2:59 AM
Subject: Re: Using xt with IIS and ASP


I have been working with JRun under IIS, and use lotusXSL to process the XML
to
HTML output.
I have encountered serious performances problems, as it takes about 1000 ms
to
generate the HTML. I am considering to shift to XT. Do anyone here know how
XT
compares to LotusXSL in performance?

Dave Carlson wrote:

> If you haven't worked with Java servlets before, I have been very happy
with
> the JRun servlet engine in combination with IIS.  JRun was developed by
> LiveSoftware, which was acquired by Allaire this past June.  So, see
> www.allaire.com for a download.  I recently downloaded their current JRun
> eval product, and noticed that a copy of both XT and IBM's XML4Java comes
> bundled with the product.  Although the XT version is not current.
>



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list