Subject: Re: Re[2]: Re:XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 23:14:59 +0000 (GMT) |
KAREN_LEICHEL@xxxxxxxx writes: > >because we do not have a jeep to hand. > > Why not? I'm just suggesting that the full program with all the > bells and whistles isn't necessary for this use. Please let know me > if I'm wrong in this assumption, since I am new to XML. and I have not even tried InDesign, so I am probably talking rubbish anyway. I just thought "someone is about to install a page formatter on my network, why don't I use it for my XML stuff". > very familiar. It doesn't allow enough pages for our documents. it has a limit on the number of pages???? in that case I won't even fire it up! > Of course, we have to break up books to run them in Arbortext > Publisher too. Or Frame, or Acrobat. But I can run as many > pages/frames as needed in PageStream or IADS. I confess that I met a limit of 65000 pages with TeX in an artificial test. > If you make enough in half a day to buy a Pentium II motherboard, > then you aren't a tech writer here. no, indeed. but if the technical authors in my institution asked for a better computer, on the grounds that they needed to run a page formatter which might help XML get into the system faster, I am sure I would have no difficulty getting that past my manager.... Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re[2]: Re:XSL FOs -> PDF using InDe, KAREN_LEICHEL | Thread | Re: XSL FOs -> PDF using InDesign, Chuck White |
node() grouping, Earl Bingham | Date | Re: test for non-null text(), Earl Bingham |
Month |