Re: vendor neutral XSL extension namespace ?

[Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 8 Nov 1999 14:04 +0700, James Clark wrote:
 > I think this is much more along the right lines, but it's not clear to
 > me how name clashes would be managed. Suppose one vendor wants a "group"
 > extension element that works a bit like xsl:for-each, and another vendor
 > wants a "group" extension element that works a bit like xsl:sort.  Or
 > suppose one vendor wants an "intersection" extension function that
 > accepts 2 arguments, and another vendor wants an "intersection"
 > extension function that accepts an arbitrary number of arguments.

While the user firstly wants something that works the same across all
implementations.

Regards,


Tony Graham
======================================================================
Tony Graham                            mailto:tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9632
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list