Subject: Re: XSLT and XPath Recommendations From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:31:41 +0000 |
Dylan Walsh wrote: > > What, if any, are the spec differences between the Proposed > Recommendation, to the current Recommendation? > For anyone who hasn't downloaded them (or viewed them): Appendix F of the XSLT Recommendation "F Changes from Proposed Recommendation (Non-Normative) The following are the changes since the Proposed Recommendation: The xsl:version attribute is required on a literal result element used as a stylesheet (see [2.3 Literal Result Element asStylesheet]). The data-type attribute on xsl:sort can use a prefixed name to specify a data-type not defined by XSLT (see [10 Sorting])." There's no Changes appendix on the XPath Recommendation. There was one in the Table of Contents of the PR (but not in the body?) which suggests to me that there are no changes, though I certainly haven't looked at it closely enough to guarantee this. Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT and XPath Recommendations, Richard Lander | Thread | testing strings, Bill Abbas |
RE: XSLT and XPath Recommendations, Richard Lander | Date | Re: Transforming HTML to WML, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |