RE: XSL iteration

["Steven Livingstone, ITS, SENM" <steven.livingstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, everything I do combines both.

Server side for clients that don't support it.
It's a hassle, but hopefully over the next 6 months things will start to
iron themselves out - for XSLT in browsers anyway.

Cheers
Steven

Steven Livingstone - http://www.deltabiz.com
07771 957 280 or +447771957280

Professional Site Server 3, Wrox Press
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002696
Professional Site Server 3.0 Commerce Edition, Wrox Press
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002505


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	r.mcarthur@xxxxxxxxxxxx [SMTP:r.mcarthur@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	3 December 1999 12:50
> To:	xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:	RE: XSL iteration
> 
> While it is nice to be able to use IE5 for client-side ms-xslt, the danger
> comes when a large client uses Navigator and is not willing to change
> their
> operations for your product.  I've just spent the last two weeks rewriting
> a
> whole pile of xslt stylesheets so we can do server-side transforms.  Now
> we
> I have to maintain two code bases - IE5 and true XSLT.  Better to have
> used
> server-side in the first place.
> 
> Rob McArthur
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Livingstone [mailto:ceo@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 8:11 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: XSL iteration
> 
> 
> Although, one argument might be that while "others" have been waiting for
> things to happen we at least have an implementation we can work with.
> 
> I know in my work place we would rather have this than wait for the
> "next(??)" version of Netscape.
> 
> I support Microsoft in what they have done as it has allowed me to at
> least
> introduce the technology to companies I have worked with wihtout having to
> worry about hte browser being changed day to day - with greatest respect,
> I
> see this happening on this list every week ! (which isn't always a bad
> thing
> !).
> 
> cheers,
> Steven
> 
> Steven Livingstone
> Glasgow, Scotland.
> +44 (0) 7771 957 280
> 
> Professional XML
> http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861003110
> Professional Site Server 3
> http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002696
> Professional Site Server 3.0 Commerce Edition
> http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002505
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 9:54 PM
> Subject: Re: XSL iteration
> 
> 
> >
> > > I would prefer a generic solution, but it should run on IE5
> > apart from the letters x s and l there is by now essentially nothing
> > in common between xslt and the language-known-as-xsl-in-ie5
> > so the idea of a generic xsl solution that runs on ie5 is rather
> > optimistic I fear.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list