Subject: Re: xt pipeline From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 13:06:40 +0800 |
> I've found through hard experience that > XSLT modulization best occurs by using > intermediate forms. That's my experience too. I've found it particularly useful with documents to go from content-based markup to structure-based markup with one stylesheet and structure-based markup to presentation-based markup with another. eg <Abstract>blah blah</Abstract> becomes <Section> <Title>Abstract</Title> blah blah </Section> becomes <div> <h2>Abstract</h2> blah blah </div> I used to (with early XSLT drafts) also do a lot of generation of stylesheets from documents, so stylesheet A would be applied to document B to get stylesheet C that would then be applied to document B to get document D. I found I don't have to do that any more, as XSLT became more powerful. > I was wondering if anyone has hooked xt to itself. SAXON can do it, I believe. I haven't come across anyone who has gotten XT to do it. James Tauber XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
xt pipeline, Clark C. Evans | Thread | Re: xt pipeline, Stefano Mazzocchi |
Re: XSLT-Based Websites, Duane Nickull | Date | Re: XSLT-Based Websites, James Tauber |
Month |