RE: FOP 0.12

["Richard Lander" <rlander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 James,

I think I just fell out of my chair. That sounds great!

Please, keep on telling us about those 'coolest' things about FOP, whether
you write them or not.

I'm looking forward to using all of that, particularly the browser.

Please advice a poor soul. What is the difference between fop_bin_0_12_0.jar
and fop_src_0_12_0.jar ? Which should I use? The question may prove that I
know nothing about java, but I still want to know. Is it 'binary' and
'source'? Or is one the browser and the other the traditional FOP?

Is there any documentation at all? Even scraps of napkins? I guess that will
come with the improvements to xml.apache.org/fop/.

Thanks for keeping up the great work.

Richard.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of James Tauber
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 8:27 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FOP 0.12


> Where might one come across FOP 0.12 . I've looked at www.jtauber.com/fop
> and at xml.apache.org/fop and see no evidence of any version past 0.11.0 .
> Am I missing something? Or is 0.12 still internal-only to the
xml.apache.org
> project? I'm not one to get too worried about that, but would merely like
to
> know of the status of the new version.

http://xml.apache.org/dist/

(we're working on improving http://xml.apache.org/fop/)

The coolest thing about FOP 0.12.0 (I'm allowed to say that because I didn't
write this bit) is a Viewer that renders your document on screen rather than
as a PDF document. FOP is one step away from being a browser! :-)

FOP 0.12.0 actually has tables too but they are only a start and aren't very
useful yet (I'm allowed to say *that* because I *did* write that bit).

James Tauber


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list