RE: two questions on Oracle XSL

Subject: RE: two questions on Oracle XSL
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 11:48:03 +0000 (GMT)
Kay Michael writes:
 > I've just published a list of known errors on the SAXON discussion list, I
 > do suggest that all SAXON users should join this at
 > http://saxon.xsl.listbot.com/

most helpful, many thanks

 > Thanks for your patience in giving SAXON 252 minutes of your computer's
 > precious time!
ICL will be receiving a bill shortly

 > Meanwhile I've seen stylesheets where a dramatic improvement is possible by
 > replacing following::x with following-sibling::x or following-sibling::x[1].

I don't think that is my situation; but in general, I would stress
that I at least am _much_ more interested in functionality than
speed. I very much appreciate the fact that Saxon's priority is
conformance with the spec. 

 > PS: referring back to your subject line, I would try normalize() which was
 > the previous name for normalize-space().
then saxon would fail!

sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread