Subject: RE: position() of the parent From: "Larry Mason" <Larry_Mason@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:57:22 -0600 |
> In fact, it is > meaningless to talk of the position() of any node other than the current > node. Ah but if in my book, I missed a footnote on some word, knowing simply it is the fifth occurrence is not extremely useful without the complete context - the first chapter, the second paragraph, the fifth occurrence of "xxx". Right? If it is meaningful to me, I need it meaningful in my XSLT processing. my $0.0199999 Larry Mason XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: position() of the parent, Kay Michael | Thread | Conformance of IE5?, Judi Thomson |
Re: XSLT/XPATH jargon, Phil Lanch | Date | Re: Re-ordering elements, John Robert Gardner |
Month |