Subject: eXtensible Interchange Language (was [Re: XML Interoperability] ) From: David DS Barnes <d.d.barnes@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 14:59:03 +0100 |
Hello XML & XSL developers, I have been wondering if there is any proposed eXtensible Interchange Language . . . Many computational codes use their own definitions of geometry and "boundary conditions"/etc for simulations of physical behaviour, and I am aware of VRML and (vaguely) 3DML(?) However, although companies support ouput (and sometimes import), this does not make very legible geometric "objects"/etc Is there any proposal to develop a common XML language that big companies could share? Anticipating with great interest, David "Roger L. Costello" wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I have a few thoughts about XML Interoperability that I would like to > kick around with ya'll. > > <snip/> -- David DS Barnes mechanical eng,imperial college | t:0171 594 7181 exhibition rd, london, sw7 2bx | f:0171 594 7127 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: variables in combination., Steve Tinney | Thread | multiple input files to one output , Linda van den Brink |
variables in combination., Pawson, David | Date | Re: variables in combination., David Carlisle |
Month |