Subject: RE: Declaring internal entities in an xsl-file From: "Mattias Beermann" <webmaster@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 23:06:32 +0100 |
> The MS parser does all kinds of what I think are strange things. I can agree on that... > But yes, in this case I'd go ahead and shut off validation. Per > the thread > on XSL-List earlier this week (I know, the archive is down), > validation and > XSLT processing do not generally play well together, even with other > (non-MS) parsers. That's because the XSLT elements and variables are in a > different vocabulary than the result tree's (XHTML's, in your > case), and it > can be quite tricky to "merge" them into one vocab, with one DTD. I havent played around much with namespaces yet, but say that you have two namespaces in a documment, then to validate the document, do you have to merge the two dtds into one, or is there a simpler/better way? > I don't think it's necessarily "bad practice" to create documents that > haven't been validated, especially in the case of XSLT where it can > actually be bad practice (as you're finding) to *force* > validation. If your > source document is valid, that's the important thing -- let the > well-formed > XSLT be checked for XSLT syntax errors by whatever XSLT processor you're > using, of course, but otherwise don't think about validation in a > core-XML > sense. (Just my opinion, others undoubtedly feel differently.) Thanks for the info, I'll follow your advice. Mattias XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Declaring internal entities in , John E. Simpson | Thread | RE: Declaring internal entities in , John E. Simpson |
RE: Declaring internal entities in , John E. Simpson | Date | XSL problem, Wnuk, Thomas |
Month |