Subject: Re: JavaScript From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:53:51 GMT |
> David: > What is your recommended solution to the original question? The <!-- and --> > ultimately need to be rendered into the HTML for browsers that do not > support JavaScript. You have to remember that I am by training and temperament a pure mathematician, so I'm a lot happier pointing out failure to conform to a spec than I am providing real world solutions... but putting it in an external file is good, and there was somewhere posted on one of the newsgroups recently a horrible mixture of sgml and javascript comment syntax that was claimed to do the right thing in all circumstances. I had a quick look just now in dejanews and failed to spot it. Also of course just doing as suggested and putting it in a comment does work in the current set of browsers, as long as you don't use -- However much I grumble that a comment is a comment and may be ignored. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: JavaScript, Emery, Ric | Thread | RE: JavaScript, Kay Michael |
RE: ** security problem and link, ural | Date | RE: JavaScript, Kay Michael |
Month |