Subject: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java From: "Mark Volkmann" <volkmann@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:41:25 -0600 |
I'm trying to find an XSLT processor that is both conformant (to the 19991116 REC) and performant. All the Java-based XSLT processors I've tried don't have impressive performance. I'm testing with the 640K "1998statistics.xml" file from the CD that comes with the "XML Bible" book and using the style sheet "baseballstats.xsl" from the same place. On a relatively fast NT box I'm getting times of 9 to 10 seconds. Is anyone aware of a C-based XSLT processor that meets my criteria? I've looked into these C-based XSLT processors. iXSLT - doesn't conform to 19991116 Oracle XML Parser - has an integrated XSLT processor - conforms to 19991116 in most areas but is missing some key features like <xsl:sort> and <xsl:output> Xalan C++ - haven't been able to get TestXSLT.exe to work even on a simple test case (gives SAXException without any indication of a specific problem) - Have you had success with this? TransforMiix - in the Mozilla source tree - doesn't seem to be ready for general use yet XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Node with maximum attribute val, Kay Michael | Thread | RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java, Kay Michael |
Re: Node with maximum attribute val, David Carlisle | Date | using XT to process Web resources, Richard Lander |
Month |