Subject: Re: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java From: "Mark Volkmann" <volkmann@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 06:46:00 -0600 |
-----Original Message----- From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 4:07 AM Subject: RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java >> >> I'm testing with the 640K "1998statistics.xml" file from the >> CD that comes with the "XML Bible" book and using the style sheet >> "baseballstats.xsl" from the same place. On a relatively fast NT box I'm >getting >> times of 9 to 10 seconds. > >If that's from the command line, then probably 5 seconds is for initialising >the Java VM and loading all the classes. If command line processing is what >you intend to do, that's fine, but don't extrapolate from this to an >environment where lots of stylesheets are being executed in turn (or a >single stylesheet is being executed repeatedly). I should have made that clear. My times are not from beginning to end of command line execution. I am performing the transformation inside my own Java code. I don't start the clock until immediately before the call to perform the transformation and I stop the clock upon return from that method. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java, Kay Michael | Thread | RE: XSLT performance - C++ vs. Java, Kay Michael |
RE: Updated XSL support in IE5?, Julian Reschke | Date | Re: Transformation to HTML, Phil Lanch |
Month |