Subject: RE: Variables and constants From: John Lam <jlam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 16:55:48 -0500 |
>> The one argument I haven't seen in anything I've read is any discussion of ease >> of use, ease of learning, or (sacrilege) "why not ask the users what they want?" Hmmm ... it would also seem to me that the presence of <xsl:call-template> is a compromise that allows procedural programmers to adjust to XSLT faster. I can't see any other really compelling reasons for its existence. Please correct me if I'm wrong here. Come to think about it, doesn't <xsl:for-each> also fit the same bill? I can't see why <xsl:apply-templates> + modes can't accomplish the same things that <xsl:for-each> can. Cheers, -John XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Variables and constants, John Lam | Thread | Re: Variables and constants, Paul Tchistopolskii |
RE: Variables and constants, John Lam | Date | Re: Variables and constants, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Month |