Subject: Re: Inheritance Model (was: XSL-fo) From: "Nikolai Grigoriev" <grig@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 13:09:22 +0300 |
Stephen Deach wrote: >Non-inherited properties (that are not "required") may also be specified >anywhere. They "inherit" from parent to child only if each level states: >property-name=inherit. Any level that does not make this statement (and >does not explicitly set a value for the property) is assumed to set the >property to the "initial" value. Ah. So, fooattr="inherit" <=> fooattr="from-parent(fooattr)", whereas I expected it to be "from-nearest-specified-value()". BTW, as far as the these two functions are concerned: are there any limits on their use? And consequently, may I conclude that _every_ feature that happens on a node may also be specified on any of its ancestors on the tree? Regards, Nikolai Grigoriev RenderX XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Inheritance Model (was: XSL-fo), Stephen Deach | Thread | Re: error in http://www.w3.org/TR/2, Jeff Caruso |
RE: FAQ candidate? parsing line-sep, Pawson, David | Date | RE: New XSL working draft available, Jarno Elovirta |
Month |