Subject: RE: XSLT vs Omnimark From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:41:45 -0500 |
HI Jonathan, Jonathan said: I have been following this converstaion and am interested as to what productive conclusion I can draw in implementing xsl. Obviously we all need the fastest method, yet one that follows standards. Please advise (the silent mediator) Didier replies: Exactly. If you can implement an XSLT engine that is very fast, can handle a lot of transaction per second on the server side, which is compliant to the latest recommendations and which also allows the usage of JavaScript (EcmaScript) function to produce a) text result, b) node list. You clearly have a winner - and me as your first custommer. Cheers Didier PH Martin ---------------------------------------------- Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com) XML Europe (http://www.gca.org) Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com) column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com) Products: http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, Jonathan Asbell | Thread | RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, James Robertson |
RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, Jonathan Asbell | Date | XSLT vs OmniMark, Steven Mielnicki |
Month |