Subject: Re: XSLT vs Omnimark From: Rick Geimer <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 16:03:48 -0800 |
James Robertson wrote: > Yes, but how do you get around the fundamental > requirement for a lot of RAM? > > I don't see how we can ever expect to parse a 150meg > document using XSLT ... > > But for all the small, everyday documents, I absolutely > agree with you. Unfortunately, my small, everyday documents are several megs each (microprocessor specs are not known for their brevity). What we need is a "lazy" implementation of XSLT that only builds as much of the tree as it needs to process a given document with a given stylesheet. Are any of the current implementations working this way? Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, James Robertson | Thread | RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, James Robertson |
Loop control, Paul Bell | Date | RE: Formatting Objects and their pr, Linda van den Brink |
Month |