Re: XSLT vs OmniMark

Linda van den Brink wrote:

> But I was very disappointed to find out that Omnimark's parser doesn't work
> with well-formed XML, only valid XML. 

OmniMark just announced (i.e. this morning) that they will have
well-formed XML support by June (it is going beta in a week or so to
members of their developer's network). They have also announced schema
support for the same time frame, but they haven't said what schema
syntax yet. 

Just an FYI,

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
XSLT vs OmniMark, (continued) Steven Mielnicki - Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:49:50 -0500 (EST) Linda van den Brink - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:40:36 +0100 Linda van den Brink - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:50:40 +0100 Louis-Dominique Dubeau - 07 Mar 2000 07:30:25 -0500 Rick Geimer - Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:53:44 -0800 <= Kay Michael - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:23:45 -0000 Juergen Hermann - Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:46:45 Clementson, Bill - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:38:22 -0700

Current Thread

XSLT vs OmniMark, (continued)
- Steven Mielnicki - Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:49:50 -0500 (EST)
- Linda van den Brink - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:40:36 +0100
- Linda van den Brink - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:50:40 +0100
  - Louis-Dominique Dubeau - 07 Mar 2000 07:30:25 -0500
  - Rick Geimer - Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:53:44 -0800 <=
- Kay Michael - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 10:23:45 -0000
- Juergen Hermann - Tue, 07 Mar 2000 09:46:45
- Clementson, Bill - Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:38:22 -0700

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSLT vs OmniMark, Louis-Dominique Dube	Thread	RE: XSLT vs Omnimark, Kay Michael
Re: Variables and Template Calls, David Carlisle	Date	Re: probably a stupid question, Louis-Dominique Dube
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home