Re: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each

Subject: Re: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each
From: Steve Tinney <stinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:37:11 -0500
> > Saxon saxon:node-set() [documented] and also saxon:nodeset()
> > [undocumented]
> 
> Actually it's documented that in matching XSL function names to Java
> method names all hyphens  are ignored

I suspected something of the sort.  It is not guaranteed, though, that
an extension function name map directly (after mangling) to a Java
method name, is it?

 Steve


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread