Subject: Re: preceding-sibling with sorted for-each From: Steve Tinney <stinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:37:11 -0500 |
> > Saxon saxon:node-set() [documented] and also saxon:nodeset() > > [undocumented] > > Actually it's documented that in matching XSL function names to Java > method names all hyphens are ignored I suspected something of the sort. It is not guaranteed, though, that an extension function name map directly (after mangling) to a Java method name, is it? Steve XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: preceding-sibling with sorted f, Kay Michael | Thread | Measuring length of the text in XSL, Chowdhury, Anisuzzam |
Re: MSXML abominations happening fo, Jonathan Borden | Date | RE: Measuring length of the text in, Dawson, Geoff F |
Month |