Subject: Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance From: "Steve Muench" <smuench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 13:09:09 -0800 |
The XSLT 1.0 Spec is also careful to provide the necessary mechanisms to built robust, portable XSLT stylesheets, even in the face of cool extensions. The <xsl:fallback> and element-available('qname') and function-available('qname') let you have good, proactive control as to what should happen if an extension on which you depend is not available. _________________________________________________________ Steve Muench, Consulting Product Manager & XML Evangelist Business Components for Java Development Team ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 12:36 PM Subject: Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance | Steven Livingstone wrote: | | > | > Anyway, from what I understand, most, if not all, products mentioned on | this | > list have their own extensions and are any 100% fully compliant? | > | > | | The XSLT extension mechanism is outlined in the spec and an example of | one was provided with James Clark's 11/99 XT implementation ... several of | the implementations have a few nits here and there, what we are talking | about is substantial compliance (modulo bugs) with full compliance as bugs | are reported and fixed. | | In summary, XSLT extensions, provided through the extension mechanism, | do not prevent compliance with http://www.w3.org/tr/xslt . | | Jonathan Borden | | | | XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list | XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Jonathan Borden | Thread | RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Steven Livingstone |
RE: possible to mimic while-like be, sara . mitchell | Date | Re: possible to mimic while-like be, Mike Brown |
Month |