Re: xalan following relative urls

Subject: Re: xalan following relative urls
From: Scott_Boag@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:21:55 -0500
> my first test indicated that it is not. my second test took 5623388
> milliseconds to run, ie about 90 minutes compared to 3 or 4 with xt:-}

I'm not sure what this has to do with relative URLs.  Without seeing your
test, I can't comment about relative performance, but I think that's off
the topic anyway.

Which version of Xalan are you running?  We've done a lot of testing and
have had a lot of usage, and haven't found any problems with relative URLs
with Xalan 1.0.0.  You shouldn't be having any problems with the command
line... my comments about SystemID don't apply for that.  Your results
certainly indicate a bug somewhere, so we'll go back and see if we can
reproduce it.

-scott




                                                                                                                                             
                    Sebastian Rahtz                                                                                                          
                    <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx        To:     xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                         
                    ord.ac.uk>                                     cc:     (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)                                       
                    Sent by:                                       Subject:     Re: xalan following relative urls                            
                    owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                             
                    03/27/00 09:20 AM                                                                                                        
                    Please respond to xsl-list                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                             




Scott_Boag@xxxxxxxxx writes:
 >
 > As far as we know, if called right, Xalan's behaviour with respect to
 > relative URLs should be equal to XT and Saxon.

my first test indicated that it is not. my second test took 5623388
milliseconds to run, ie about 90 minutes compared to 3 or 4 with xt:-}

 > The common mistake is not
 > setting the SystemID if you call Xalan with a stream or DOM tree, since
 > Xalan has to know what URL to be relative to!
 >

I am not sure I would know what a SystemID was if it bit me. I am
doing a command line

 java -mx64m org.apache.xalan.xslt.Process -IN $1 -XSL $2 -OUT $3 $4 $5 $6

is there something else I could be doing?

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list





 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread