Subject: RE: The XSL-List Digest V2 #582 From: Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 15:00:05 +0100 |
>Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 14:04:56 +0200 >From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@xxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: Is it time for an XSLT-list? > >> I wonder if it's time for those of us who aren't interested >> in IE5 1998 XSL >> to take ourselves off to a new XSLT-list, where hopefully >> these people won't >> find us? > >I wonder if that's a good solution; it would be like fleeing and going in >hiding, wouldn't it? Also, it would be a shame if XSLT-beginners, who may >innocently be using IE5 and thinking they're dealing with XSLT, and who may >be ready to switch to a better XSLT processor when we advise them to, would >not be able to find us. I understand and share your frustration, though. > >Maybe a not-so-bad idea would be is to have a standard reply for people >using ie5-xsl, along the lines of <snip> That message should be sent out to new subscribers, and perhaps sent once to every one on the list (as a seperate message for those of us who receive it as a digest). It might also include some of the list etiquette issues which keep cropping up i.e.: 1. No attachments 2. Send as plain text, not HTML 3. Trim the quoted text in your responses & and none of the "he said, she said" format. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Which parser to use?, Jim Michael | Thread | xsl generated links, Paal Eriksen |
Which parser to use?, Westerlund, Malin | Date | Re: document()-function, using 2 ar, michael gruber |
Month |