Subject: RE: "Translate function" From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 10:55:59 -0400 |
Hi Sebastian, Sebastian said: It's a matter of fact that xt is (currently) faster than saxon or any of the others[1]. Didier replies: You probably meant by the [1] (usually a footnote reference) that it is faster than any of the other Java based XSLT implementations not necessarily faster than the C++ based implementations. Cheers Didier PH Martin ---------------------------------------------- Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Conferences: XML Europe (http://www.gca.org) Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com) column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com) Products: http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: "Translate function", Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: "Translate function", Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: relative and base URIs when usi, michael gruber | Date | RE: "Translate function", Didier PH Martin |
Month |