<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: referring to images in XSL FO

Subject: Re: referring to images in XSL FO
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:44:42 +0100 (BST)
David Tolpin writes:
 > >  > If the url argument is not taken within url(...) it is not possible to parse
 > >  > shorthands.
 > >  > 
 > > 
 > > speaking for PassiveTeX, I have no intention, ever, ever, of supporting
 > > shorthands......
 > 
 > Do you have no intention to support them because it is the wrong
 > way? Or they are difficult to implement? Or one can go pretty happy
 > without them?

all of the above. I think they are evil, hard to
implement for me, and unnecessary. the bottom line is, who writes .fo
files? human fingers or computers? do computers need shorthands?

sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: referring to images in XSL FO, David Tolpin Thread Re: referring to images in XSL FO, David Carlisle
select attribute in apply-templates, Richard Bell Date RE: RE: could one xsl file generate, Johan Andreasson
Month