Subject: Re: referring to images in XSL FO From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 11:47:05 +0100 (BST) |
> Do you have no intention to support them because it is the wrong way? Or they > are difficult to implement? Or one can go pretty happy without them? Or because they are an ugly unnecessary complication that takes the admirable aim of aligning with CSS on formating object and property names and semantics one step too far and starts to align on syntax. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: referring to images in XSL FO, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: referring to images in XSL FO, Nikolai Grigoriev |
RE: RE: could one xsl file generate, Johan Andreasson | Date | RE: XSLTTester - MSXML & Xalan XSLT, chris bayes |
Month |