Subject: Re: Rant : "Microsoft is compliant with the XSL spec" From: Dan Morrison <dman@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 00:00:28 +1200 |
Warren Hedley wrote: > [a very well-written, balanced article] Thanks for that. I'll pass that on to the corporates (& uni) I'm consulting to here when the thing comes to Wellington... oops, too late. Sounds like you handled your issues appropriately. I'd have been v. noisy ;-) What were they selling? If the namespace was out of date, I guess it wasn't the XML component. As an aside tho, I wll say that I'm happy with the way MS is pushing the whole XML thing. It's given the industry a LOT of push and interest, and bodes well for the embracing of open-standards by MS. Niggles & unfortunate 'mistakes' (like the namespace) aside, their role has actually been pretty positive. .dan. -- :=====================:====================: : Dan Morrison : The Web Limited : : http://here.is/dan : http://web.co.nz : : dman@xxxxxxxx : danm@xxxxxxxxx : : 04 384 1472 : 04 495 8250 : : 025 207 1140 : : :.....................:....................: : If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy? :.........................................: XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Rant : "Microsoft is compliant with, Warren Hedley | Thread | Re: Rant : "Microsoft is compliant , Warren Hedley |
Java API for xsl-t, Omar López Ruiz | Date | Re: I've modified my parser to copy, Nikolai Grigoriev |
Month |