Re: XSL FO conformance

Subject: Re: XSL FO conformance
From: "Rick Geimer" <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:33:11 -0700
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

> a) why is <table-footer> extended, but
> <table-header> basic? why would anyone be able to implement one but
> not the other?

Actually, most word-processing table editors, and even the Oasis table
model, do not support table footers, which is probably why this is
considered an extended feature. 

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread