Subject: Re: XSL FO conformance From: "Rick Geimer" <Rick.Geimer@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:33:11 -0700 |
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > a) why is <table-footer> extended, but > <table-header> basic? why would anyone be able to implement one but > not the other? Actually, most word-processing table editors, and even the Oasis table model, do not support table footers, which is probably why this is considered an extended feature. Rick Geimer National Semiconductor rick.geimer@xxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL FO conformance, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: XSL FO conformance, Sebastian Rahtz |
how to select attribute value based, Igor Nakshin | Date | Re: Rant : "Microsoft is compliant , Warren Hedley |
Month |