Subject: RE: The XSL-List Digest V2 #598 From: "Medina, Edward" <emedina@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:30:00 -0400 |
Frankly, This is way off topic, and should not be in this forum. If people want to rant a rave at each other please do it in another medium. Thanks Eddy : >So far this list has been a great help to me, mainly :thanks to the :patience : >of usual repliers. If it is going to degenerate into another :Microsoft : >bashing zone then I'm out. : : Bye. (sniff) : : >Frankly, the amount of time and energy spent by : >developers in this organisation, and I am sure many others, :exchanging petty : >digs @ Microsoft is scandalous. Look it's easy ... if you don't :like : >Microsoft's products don't use them. : : Look it's easy - if Microsoft don't like open :technologies, don't :use them, don't pollute them. The issue here, which people are very :sensitive to in the light of Microsofts approach to Java, is :that Microsoft :produces non-standard implementations to tie people to their products & :platform. This may not be what they are doing now - they :implemented a very :early version of XSL, and are currently updating it, but you :cannot blame :people for watching them carefully. Microsoft people have :stated that they :don't like certain things in XML specs, and so do not intend :to implement :them, and the prospects of this happening with future versions of IE is :alarming to people who are working so hard for a better WWW. : : By the way, what organisation are you refering to? This :list does :*not* speak for the W3C. : : : XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list : XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: The XSL-List Digest V2 #598, Dylan Walsh | Thread | RE: The XSL-List Digest V2 #598, Jon Ceanfaglione |
Calling JavaCode From a stylesheet, mohamed | Date | Re: RE: Attribute test problem solv, David Carlisle |
Month |