Subject: RE: process order (still...) From: sara.mitchell@xxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 13:51:13 -0400 |
Well, this is probably not why attributes aren's considered to be ordered, but at least from my perspective there is a good reason for it. >Mike Brown wrote [snip] > Okay so according to XPath, the order of attribute nodes is undefined > except for the fact that like namespace nodes, they occur > before any child > nodes (text, comment, p.i., or element nodes) of the element node > they are associated with. > [snip] > Also, it seems to be complicated by the fact that element > nodes do have a > natural order. Take for example the node-set returned by this XPath > expression for an imaginary XHTML document: "//img/@*" ... Could I be > assured that //img[1]'s attribute nodes would come before //img[2]'s? There is a semantic difference. Element nodes have the content -- the semantic meaning of the document. At least in the document world, the order in which content is written and presented frequently can affect not only the meaning but the entire 'information design' (yes, some writers do do this). Attributes, however, are more like 'meta-data' about the content. So a "mark" and a "role" attribute on a list item have some meaning about the list item, but don't necessarily interact with each other. The order in which they are processed or used doesn't have any semantic meaning to the information. I do agree that this can create some strange effects in terms of actual processing. I have actually run into a situation where this created a problem in the output -- but that was because Microsoft HTML help insisted on attributes in a specific order in order to behave reliably, which from my perspective is bad design on their part. I finally got around the issue by changing my template to process the attributes individually in a specific order. A little more verbose, but it worked (and I'm always glad when I can say that). Sara XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: process order (still...), David Carlisle | Thread | RE: process order (still...), Kevin Williams |
Re: Attribute test problem solved, David Carlisle | Date | No side effects holy cow. ( Re: pro, Paul Tchistopolskii |
Month |