Subject: RE: XSL-List admin query From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:30:08 -0700 |
In Microsoft Outlook 2000 I use the following rules: Move messages sent to xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to folder xsl-list. Move messages sent to xsl-list-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to folder xsl-list. I also have a rule which brings messages containing keywords such as Microsoft and MSXML to my attention. This has been quite effective for me. - Jonathan Marsh Microsoft > -----Original Message----- > From: MarkH@xxxxxxxx [mailto:MarkH@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 3:14 AM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: XSL-List admin query > > > -----Original Message----- > From: XSL-List Owner [SMTP:xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 4:43 PM > > At 7 Apr 2000 09:26 +0100, MarkH@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > i have a problem setting rules to detect and file > these messages > away from > > my inbox. most messages have a trailer " XSL-List info and > archive: > > http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list" which i > can match on, > but some > > don't. > [bulk deleted - extracts below] > > Regards, > > > Tony Graham > -- > > Hi Tony > > > All XSL-List messages have the same footer. > If only this were true I'd have no problem. Most do have the standard > footer, but some don't. See below for an example from the > archive which you > can check yourself. > > > Match on the "sender" field > Microsoft Outlook (yes some people have to use Microsoft > software!) does not > allow matching on "sender" (or "reply to" etc.). Only > From/To/Subject/Body > sections. Matching on "To" is no good because people use aliases (and > Outlook doesn't see beyond these to the address). I tried > matching on the > footer, but as I said, some messages don't have the standard footer. > > Its an irritation rather than a big deal so if nothing can be > done i'll shut > up about it! > > Thanks > > Mark > -- > Example email which lacks the standard footer (taken from the > archive): > > XSL-List Archive > last() function > From: "Richard Bell" <RichardBell@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 02:06:52 +0100 > Organization: Rogge Global Partners PLC > > Using SAXON I statements like > > <xsl:if test="position()=last()"/> > > seem to work OK. However, when I parse using MSXML3 I get an error > > 'Last() function must have a node-set to operate on. > position()=-->last<--()' > > Any thoughts. Thanks. > Rich. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------- > ---- > > Follow-Ups: > [rest of sample email deleted] > > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL-List admin query, Steven Livingstone | Thread | Re: XSL-List admin query, David Carlisle |
RE: How to get started with MSXML, Kay Michael | Date | Re: XSL-List admin query, David Carlisle |
Month |