Subject: Re: Cascading with <?xml-stylesheet?> From: Matt Sergeant <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 21:38:02 +0100 (BST) |
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Sorry - I know this isn't particularly an XSL or XPath question, but it is > particularly relevant... > > The xml-stylesheet recommendation > (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-stylesheet) makes no mention of cascading - > i.e. following the processing by one stylesheet, you process with > another. Does anyone know if this is intentional for XML (e.g. it can be > implemented by xsl includes, or alternate means) or something that was > neglected from the recommendation, or something that because the > recommendation references REC-html40 that we just have to figure out for > ourselves? Hate to reply to myself... It appears that it does make sense: Cascading is supported where the language supports cascading: i.e. in CSS, but not in XSL(T). Thanks for listening to me rambling ;-) -- <Matt/> Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions Email for training and consultancy availability. http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Cascading ( Or processing twice, Dan Morrison | Thread | Re: Cascading with <?xml-stylesheet, Matt Sergeant |
Cascading with <?xml-stylesheet?>, Matt Sergeant | Date | poor IE5/XSL performance?, Alan Houser |
Month |