Subject: Re: Sibling text() Content Match [was: Re: expression value not a node set on content match] From: John Robert Gardner <jrgardn@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 18:42:56 -0400 (EDT) |
Thanks mike-- yes, you're right, I left off text() in the pasted code, even when I put it in the subject line If I'm right, using text() would have alleviated some of the redundancy/lack of specificity that David pointed out in my solution, yes? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-= John Robert Gardner, Ph.D. XML Engineer Emory University ------------------------------------------------------------ http://vedavid.org/diss/ "If there is something you're thinking of doing, or wish you could do, begin it. In boldness there is mystery and power . . . . " -Goethe XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Sibling text() Content Match [w, Mike Brown | Thread | Re: Sibling text() Content Match [w, David Carlisle |
XML schema generator, Abhay Jain | Date | Re: Sibling text() Content Match [w, David Carlisle |
Month |