Subject: Re: feature request From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:19:32 +0100 (BST) |
James Robertson writes: > Half-jokingly: > > So this is the way of the future for XSLT? > > If you can't support something in a way that > works (entities), attempt to > convince people that they shouldn't even want > them in the first place ... ? I don't think its fair to blame XSL for all this. It is going with the flow of things like SAX and DOM, which do not provide access to entities. For XSLT to do otherwise would be to place a much bigger burden on the implementors. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: feature request, James Robertson | Thread | Re: feature request, James Robertson |
xsl Books, Jo Kong HO | Date | Re: Saxon's Line Breaks, Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |