Subject: Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /descendant::ccc differently From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 09:24:51 +0100 (BST) |
> By now I thought that //foo is an abbrev form of /descendant::foo > Am I missing something or is there some shared bug ? Thanks. The former. xpath spec says As in location paths, // is short for /descendant-or-self::node()/. > <xsl:value-of select="//ccc[5]"/> gives no hit > <xsl:value-of select="/descendant::ccc[5]"/> gives c22 and one assumes <xsl:value-of select="/descendant-or-self::node()/ccc[5]"/> does the same as // "//ccc[5]" selects ccc elements that are 5th ccc children of their parents. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /desc, Miloslav Nic | Thread | Re: XT and SAXON treats //ccc and /, Miloslav Nic |
Portal applications using XSL, Hoad, Richard (AFIS) | Date | Re: XSL Performance, Juergen Hermann |
Month |